Telegram Open Network [IOU]の‌価格GRAM

$GRAM holding firm on 4H support! 💶🚀 $GRAM tested 1.195 and bounced strong up to 1.389 before settling into a neat consolidation zone around 1.316. Moving averages are catching up beneath price, providing a solid cushion for the next upward push toward 1.36+! $ICP $PSG

$GRAM / EUR | V Shape Reversal Underway 💎 $GRAM printed a sharp reversal off the $1.195 bottom and is now reclaiming key exponential levels at 1.331 EUR. Consecutive green daily closes show momentum shifting back to the buyers. Eyes on a push to challenge the $1.41 $1.50 resistance zone next! ⚡ $AGLD $SAND

STONpowered: Building the Infrastructure Layer for TON’s Next Generation of Apps The evolution of Web3 is moving beyond standalone protocols. The next phase is about infrastructure that seamlessly integrates into the products users already love.@ston_fi STON.fi is expanding its role as a core liquidity and swap infrastructure layer within the TON ecosystem, enabling builders to focus on innovation without the complexity of building their own exchange systems or sourcing liquidity. Recent integrations highlight this approach: DTrade One of TON’s leading trading bots has integrated STON.fi v1 and v2 liquidity pools into its execution layer, giving users access to TON liquidity while benefiting from advanced trading features such as limit orders, copy trading, and analytics. Fact Market By integrating the Omniston swap widget, Fact Market enables Telegram communities to access seamless on chain prediction markets. Users can swap jettons to GRAM directly inside the application, with routing, slippage protection, and settlement handled automatically. These integrations demonstrate a key Web3 trend: invisible infrastructure powering visible user experiences. As more builders adopt STON.fi SDK and Omniston, TON’s ecosystem moves closer to a future where decentralized finance becomes native, accessible, and frictionless. The future of Web3 will be built by applications. The foundation will be powered by infrastructure. STON.fi is helping build that foundation. #STONfi #TON #DeFi #Web3 #Blockchain

Impermanent Loss: The Cost of Providing Liquidity Nobody Warns You About Earning fees by adding liquidity sounds like free money—until the two tokens drift apart in price and your withdrawal is worth less than if you'd just held them. That gap is impermanent loss, DeFi's most misunderstood risk. 🔎 What Impermanent Loss Actually Is - The difference between holding two tokens and providing them as liquidity. - Caused by the pool automatically rebalancing as prices move. - "Impermanent" only if prices return to their original ratio—otherwise it's realized on withdrawal. - Affects every constant-product AMM pool, not just STONfi. 📊 Why It Happens A pool like GRAM/USDT holds both assets in a fixed ratio. When GRAM's price rises, arbitrageurs buy GRAM until it matches the market—leaving less GRAM and more USDT. Your share now holds more of the asset that didn't rise. In short: 1. You deposit GRAM and USDT in equal value. 2. GRAM's price moves significantly. 3. Arbitrage trades rebalance the pool's reserves. 4. Your withdrawal reflects the new ratio, not the original one. 5. Fees earned may offset that gap—or may not. 🧩 Impermanent Loss vs Just Holding - Holding: your balance moves exactly with the market. - Providing liquidity: your balance moves with rebalancing plus fees earned. - The wider the price divergence, the bigger the potential gap. 💡 What You Can Do About It Pairing volatile assets with stablecoins, favoring pairs that historically move together, and weighing fee income before judging a position are the usual mitigations. There's no way to eliminate impermanent loss in a standard AMM pool—only manage exposure to it. Takeaway: liquidity fees compensate for a real risk, not a bonus on holding. Calculated your impermanent loss on a position? Was fee income enough to cover it? 👇 Not investment advice - research on your own! 🚀 $BTC $GRAM